Monday, December 10, 2012

The Banditos and Liberal Protestants


I think it is just as scary to do a risky and immoral act as it is to do a risky and noble one. In my younger days I had all but lost that alarm system which sounds when you are about to harm yourself or do something that would land you in prison or even dead. In my days self defeating I spent some time in a small western town with a Puerto Rican dude named Nick. He was from New York City and was crazy. By crazy I mean he had a high tolerance for danger and a low regard for safety. His natural charm won the confidence of a wide variety of persons from every segment and strata of society.  He had a quick smile. As far has he was concerned everything was “cool.” “It’s all cool” he repeatedly said to me when I frequently showed any signs of losing my nerve.
He stayed with Rita, a Mexican American, who was, if possible, even more laid back than Nick.  She lived in a one bedroom house which was part of a federally funded complex. She had several small children, but her mother cared for them. I never once saw them or signs of them. I remember that it was strange that her place was in the middle of town and yet the streets were packed dirt – not even gravel – just packed dirt. I was never directly involved in the purchase or sale of the vast amount of marijuana that passed through Rita’s apartment but I was there when it was received, processed, packaged, and distributed.  I never financially profited from it. I never purchased any of it. I know my disclaimers do not excuse my presence there and knowledge of their illegal activities. It has remained one of those things in my life that I consider when I think of the sins Christ atoned for on the cross. Although the activity was extremely immoral, the relationships were pleasant and real. Unlike many of my Churchly colleagues, I trusted Nick and Rita to “have my back.”

One evening I stopped by and came in through an outside entrance that opened to the kitchen. From the sounds of their voices I surmised there was a group of six African American men lounging in the small living room. They intently listened to what they called “Rap.” It was not like the Rap Music we hear today - old school, new school, west coast or eat coast. It was more a poetry reading than singing. It was like the style of some Black Preachers combined with the Beat Generation poets like Alan Ginsberg and Neal Cassity. There were lots of bongos. But the message was strictly political. It was a negative message about all white men and the American society at every level. Whites were considered a deadly threat to all Blacks. Violence was promoted throughout the Rap.  Rita stopped me in the kitchen and ordered me to leave. “These N…s are crazy and they will mess you up.” I asked if I could just sit at the kitchen table and listen. Rita almost never was stern but this was the exception. She gave me clear instructions on how and when to take my leave. I sat close to the backdoor and listened with fascination. I have always felt a sense of rage over racial injustice so the poetry drew me in. I was frightened and yet was willing to take the risk.

One Saturday, eight members of the Bandito gang rolled in on their Harleys. The one riding an Indian got a pass because this bike was the forerunner to the revered Harley Davidson. These guys came to see Nick about a large score of weed they brought from Mexico. They were wild and I liked them very much. They drank beer all afternoon and into the night. As time passed, they got louder and meaner. That is when I decided I had better find my way back to my apartment. All the while I was there; just as I did with the Black militants, I felt that same combination of fear and the thrill of taking a risk.

These risks were real and unrighteous. I risked going to prison. I risk serious injury and even death. All of this was for the sake of being too stupid to understand the threat I was under and too nihilistic to care much. Nothing I did then advanced the Gospel of Jesus Christ. At that point in my life, I wasn’t close to the Church, although I was always a seeker after God.  It wasn't very easy to walk away from this adventure. Nick and Rita were my friends, I liked them and they liked me. They were doing what they saw others doing in their families and among their friends. For them, the risk was part and partial of the only life they knew.

I am not facing a hostile gang of bikers or politically militant minorities. I am facing, none the less, a real and present danger from Liberal Middle-Class Protestant Church professionals who want to silence me for “keepin it real.”  Just as though I was part of the Banditos, there is a strict sanction administered against those who are disloyal to their revisionistic ideology. Like Nick and Rita, a person can become more and more involved in a destructive and wicked organization. One day, you realize that leaving is more dangerous than staying.

I often think of Jesus in the Garden the day before his public execution. He knew how to escape. He was encouraged by his friends to do just that. Even he, himself, desired to leave and avoid the humiliation of a trial and the degradation of a cruel public execution where he hung naked on a wooden stake for six hours while his enemies insulted him.

I am sure that faithfulness to God is never truly risky, although it will surely lead to pain and suffering. While the risk is immediate, it is not ultimately life threatening. You can not kill someone who lives forever in the blissful presence of Christ Jesus our Lord.

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

A Prospective


So what if 100 or 200 or a thousand evangelical congregations withdraw from the PC (USA) by the end of next year. That denomination still will have over nine to ten thousand congregations remaining (10,266). There are still more than 21,000 ordained ministers - less than half are working the church. The latest statistics available (2011) indicate that the PC (USA) received no congregations from other denominations in the past four years reported. The PC (USA) dismissed, on average, 22 congregations every year since 2008. From 2008 to 20011 86 congregations were dismissed to other denominations. This doesn’t count the few who left without being officially dismissed or those who have left in 2012.  
In the presbytery where I reside, more than half the congregations cannot raise the minimum level of compensation for a full time seminary educated pastor. Of the ten thousand congregations currently a part of the PC(USA) it is possible that half are unable to call a full time pastor. Now we are considering 5,000 mission viable congregations all but a handful of which are in a steady membership decline. On average about 45 % of the active membership of any Presbyterian Church (USA) are in worship on a given Sunday.

It is has been pointed out many times, by evangelical leaders, that the decline began in the mid-1960s when the national church, already moderately liberal, took an even sharper turn to the left. Denominational insiders, naturally, deny that there is a correlation between the politicalization of the Presbyterian Church (USA) and the steady decline in members. We are less than half the size we were in 1965. Some studies have indicated that we lose people mostly to no church at all. They not only leave the Presbyterian Church (USA) but withdraw from the Church of Jesus Church. This indicates to me that we are doing an ineffective job in nurturing faith in our youth and have been so for a very long time. When a denomination moves into the godless secular world, thereby worshipping its values, why should the secularists see any relevence is worshipping the God revealed through sacred scripture? 

 The leaders of the PC(USA), at the national level, spends ten times the amount of its mission resources in the pursuit of “justice” than it does on advancing the kingdom through the pronouncement of the Gospel. It is little wonder that we are becoming increasingly secular.

If you have a program calendar from the GA offices in Louisville, you will find a staff directly at the back of the calendar. In reviewing it, just now, I am amazed at how the structure has downsized since I last looked at it. Many departments that were once independent are now combined into one large section with a single senior director and many associate directors under that one person. Many of the offices are associated with various gender and ethnic/racial adjectives denoting each. Some are directly structured to support a specific social cause – such as the environment or peacemaking. The most overt pursuit of “civilian affairs” is obvious at our Washington and United Nations’ offices where direct lobbying takes place. Under the title “social witness” I noticed that the associate who was (perhaps still is) responsible for advocating for a tomato pickers’ union in Florida is now hidden under a more ambiguous title. At one time she had her own office title and staff assistant with a budget in excess of one hundred thousand dollars.

We can certainly expect greater visibility of homosexual rights advocacy now that we have born false witness by declaring their behavior to be holy and righteous before the Lord. There will be a concerted effort to place homosexual pastors in congregations, just as there was once such an effort to place women in our pulpits. There might even be an openly gay person elected moderator of the General Assembly. How many of our current stock of clergy have kept their homosexual behavior secret?

Of the 13,000 ordained Teaching Elders more than half are female. The number of female clergy was zero in 1950. While most evangelicals oppose the ordination of homosexuals, they support the ordination of women. Since a landmark judicial case in the late 1970’s where a candidate for ministry was denied ordination because he opposed the ordination of women, there are no evangelicals who would dare admit their opposition to the ordination of women. I see the same dynamic with the forced acceptance of homosexual clergy. What is currently permissive will one day become mandatory. Please note this, all you peace-at-any-price moderates who want to be seen as those who honor the Word of God.

The loss of evangelical congregations, whether it is a hundred or a thousand, will have only a small financial impact on the national offices or their programs. The most controversial or progressive offices are funded by endowment monies. I suspect that the financial shortfall in the budgets of the national offices is due more to a lower return on investments than a decrease in giving.

For those congregations that depart the PC(USA) and find a Reformed body that still proclaims to saving grace of Jesus Christ, it is likely that you will escape the influence of a steady decline in numbers and faithfulness.

The only hope I have for the renewed spiritual vitality and restored faithfulness of the PC(USA) rests solely in the mighty hand of God. Looking toward the dry bones of the PC(USA) which will only come when all the current flesh has completely rotted away. I do not hear God asking me, “Can these bones live again.” If He did, I would have to answer like the prophet and say, “O Lord, only thou knowest” (Ezk 37:3) Just as I do not hear my Lord turning my eyes on the drying bones of a rotting denomination, I do not hear my God exhorting me to “Preach to those bones.” I fear the day of preaching righteousness while amidst the decaying souls of the PC(USA) is long past.