So what if 100 or 200 or a thousand evangelical congregations
withdraw from the PC (USA) by the end of next year. That denomination still will
have over nine to ten thousand congregations remaining (10,266). There are
still more than 21,000 ordained ministers - less than half are working the church. The latest statistics available
(2011) indicate that the PC (USA) received no congregations from other denominations
in the past four years reported. The PC (USA) dismissed, on average, 22
congregations every year since 2008. From 2008 to 20011 86 congregations were
dismissed to other denominations. This doesn’t count the few who left without
being officially dismissed or those who have left in 2012.
In the presbytery where I reside, more than half the
congregations cannot raise the minimum level of compensation for a full time seminary
educated pastor. Of the ten thousand congregations currently a part of the
PC(USA) it is possible that half are unable to call a full time pastor. Now we
are considering 5,000 mission viable congregations all but a handful of which
are in a steady membership decline. On average about 45 % of the active
membership of any Presbyterian Church (USA) are in worship on a given Sunday.
It is has been pointed out many times, by evangelical
leaders, that the decline began in the mid-1960s when the national church,
already moderately liberal, took an even sharper turn to the left. Denominational
insiders, naturally, deny that there is a correlation between the
politicalization of the Presbyterian Church (USA) and the steady decline in
members. We are less than half the size we were in 1965. Some studies have
indicated that we lose people mostly to no church at all. They not only leave
the Presbyterian Church (USA) but withdraw from the Church of Jesus Church. This
indicates to me that we are doing an ineffective job in nurturing faith in our
youth and have been so for a very long time. When a denomination moves into the godless secular world, thereby worshipping its values, why should the secularists see any relevence is worshipping the God revealed through sacred scripture?
If you have a program calendar from the GA offices in Louisville, you will find a staff directly at the back of the calendar. In reviewing it, just now, I am amazed at how the structure has downsized since I last looked at it. Many departments that were once independent are now combined into one large section with a single senior director and many associate directors under that one person. Many of the offices are associated with various gender and ethnic/racial adjectives denoting each. Some are directly structured to support a specific social cause – such as the environment or peacemaking. The most overt pursuit of “civilian affairs” is obvious at our Washington and United Nations’ offices where direct lobbying takes place. Under the title “social witness” I noticed that the associate who was (perhaps still is) responsible for advocating for a tomato pickers’ union in Florida is now hidden under a more ambiguous title. At one time she had her own office title and staff assistant with a budget in excess of one hundred thousand dollars.
We can certainly expect greater visibility of homosexual
rights advocacy now that we have born false witness by declaring their behavior
to be holy and righteous before the Lord. There will be a concerted effort to
place homosexual pastors in congregations, just as there was once such an effort
to place women in our pulpits. There might even be an openly gay person elected
moderator of the General Assembly. How many of our current stock of clergy have kept their homosexual behavior secret?
Of the 13,000 ordained Teaching Elders more than half are
female. The number of female clergy was zero in 1950. While most evangelicals
oppose the ordination of homosexuals, they support the ordination of women.
Since a landmark judicial case in the late 1970’s where a candidate for
ministry was denied ordination because he opposed the ordination of women,
there are no evangelicals who would dare admit their opposition to the
ordination of women. I see the same dynamic with the forced acceptance of
homosexual clergy. What is currently permissive will one day become mandatory. Please note this, all you peace-at-any-price moderates who want to be seen as those who honor the Word of God.
The loss of evangelical congregations, whether it is a
hundred or a thousand, will have only a small financial impact on the national
offices or their programs. The most controversial or progressive offices are funded
by endowment monies. I suspect that the financial shortfall in the budgets of
the national offices is due more to a lower return on investments than a
decrease in giving.
For those congregations that depart the PC(USA) and find
a Reformed body that still proclaims to saving grace of Jesus Christ, it is likely
that you will escape the influence of a steady decline in numbers and
faithfulness.
The only hope I have for the renewed spiritual vitality and restored faithfulness of the PC(USA) rests solely in the mighty hand of God. Looking toward the dry bones of the PC(USA) which will only come when all the current flesh has completely rotted away. I do not hear God asking me, “Can these bones live again.” If He did, I would have to answer like the prophet and say, “O Lord, only thou knowest” (Ezk 37:3) Just as I do not hear my Lord turning my eyes on the drying bones of a rotting denomination, I do not hear my God exhorting me to “Preach to those bones.” I fear the day of preaching righteousness while amidst the decaying souls of the PC(USA) is long past.
The only hope I have for the renewed spiritual vitality and restored faithfulness of the PC(USA) rests solely in the mighty hand of God. Looking toward the dry bones of the PC(USA) which will only come when all the current flesh has completely rotted away. I do not hear God asking me, “Can these bones live again.” If He did, I would have to answer like the prophet and say, “O Lord, only thou knowest” (Ezk 37:3) Just as I do not hear my Lord turning my eyes on the drying bones of a rotting denomination, I do not hear my God exhorting me to “Preach to those bones.” I fear the day of preaching righteousness while amidst the decaying souls of the PC(USA) is long past.
I consider myself an evangelical. Some of my fellow seminarians, back in the 1970's, called me a fundamentalist. They were exagerating but that was their typical assessment of anyone who held to the core of the traditional, orthodox, Bible-revering, reformed faith. My views have not changed much since then. It seems as though a lot of evangelicals do not hear our Lord calling us to preach to the dry bones of the church. However, I clearly hear the word of God say: "Preach the word, be urgent in season and out of season." There you have it, what clearer call could anyone want? Why do we evangelicals seem to only listen to half the world of God? When did we come to believe that taking up the cross meant taking the way of least resistance?
ReplyDelete